Hydrophilic vs. Hydrophobic Coatings vs. Uncoated Surfaces for Medical Device Navigation?

One of the most critical performance requirements in healthcare today is smooth and safe medical device navigation through the body. The success of vascular catheters, guidewires, and endoscopes, among other devices depends heavily on how easily they can glide through tissue, blood vessels, mucosal linings, or tight anatomical spaces. They need to navigate without causing damage, discomfort, or any complications during the medical procedures. ^1,2

Medical device manufacturers utilize medical coating technology to improve their devices’ ability to navigate  these challenging pathways. Different surface coating technologies are available for this purpose. They primarily include hydrophilic coatings (water-loving) and hydrophobic (water-repelling) coatings. Other manufacturers produce uncoated devices. Each type of surface coating (Hydrophilic, Hydrophobic, or Uncoated) has differing performance characteristics, and each has its own benefits and limitations. 

In this article we compare how well hydrophilic coatings, hydrophobic coatings, and uncoated devices perform in terms of navigation. We will compare these options with respect to the following: friction & lubricity; compatibility with blood; patient comfort; infection control; durability; regulatory compliance, and more.

Introduction to Different Medical Device Coating Options

Option 1: Hydrophilic Medical Coatings

Hydrophilic coatings are water-loving. They attract and bind water molecules, forming a smooth, slippery, gel-like surface when activated. Their chemistry typically includes hydrophilic polymers, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene glycol (PEG), or zwitterionic polymers. When hydrated, the coating becomes extremely lubricious, dramatically reducing surface friction.³

Key Characteristics of hydrophilic coatings:

• Water-attracting
• Form a gel-like layer when “activated” by moisture
• High lubricity when wet, often referred to as “slippery-when-wet” coatings
• Reduce coefficient of friction between device surface and human tissue
• Improve insertion and navigation of devices in the body
• Excellent for gliding through tight anatomical spaces
• Strong anti-fouling and anti-thrombogenic behavior

Option 2: Hydrophobic Coatings

The term hydrophobic refers to the ability of a material to repel water by creating an atmosphere of low-energy surfaces. Hence, hydrophobic coatings repel water. However, hydrophobic materials do not provide the “slippery” feel that hydrophilic coatings do. Hydrophobic coating materials can be made from PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), silicone, and fluoropolymers.^4,5

Key Characteristics of Hydrophobic Coatings:

• Water-repelling
• Reduced friction vs uncoated surfaces, but not as slick as hydrophilic surfaces
• Good chemical resistance
• Preferred for devices requiring durability and biostability

Option 3: Uncoated Devices

Uncoated Devices

Uncoated medical devices are instruments, supplies, or implants that are not coated with specialized surface coatings. As a result, the navigation performance of these devices is determined by the characteristics of their base materials, like stainless steel or plastics.

Key Characteristics of Uncoated Devices:

• Uncoated surfaces have the highest friction among the three options (hydrophilic coated, hydrophobic coated, and uncoated surfaces)
• Likely more risk of tissue damage or vessel trauma
• No added lubricity, hemocompatibility, or anti-infection features outside of that provided by base materials
• Tradeoff: costs less, but sacrifices performance

1. Ranking Surface Options In Terms of
Lubricity & Friction Reduction^4,6,7

The surface friction between an instrument and biological tissue dictates how an instrument may be inserted, advanced, rotated, or withdrawn. Using lubricious, low-friction materials allows clinicians to improve their ability to control the instrument, reduce the amount of force needed to manipulate the instrument, and decrease the amount of tissue damage that occurs.

Below we rank the three surface options from first to last in terms of lubricity and friction reduction.

1^st – Hydrophilic Coatings Offer the Best Lubricity in Wet Conditions

Hydrophilic coatings provide excellent lubrication after being hydrated. A hydrophilic coating can significantly decrease the amount of friction generated as compared to an uncoated surface. This is especially important in such fields as vascular surgery, urology, and gastrointestinal surgery

Advantages of Hydrophilic Coatings:

• Significantly increases lubricity and reduces friction compared to uncoated devices
• Smooth gliding with minimal force
• Lower risk of endothelial or mucosal damage
• Less patient discomfort during insertion
• Lower risk of device buckling or kinking

2^nd – Hydrophobic Coatings: Moderate Lubricity

Hydrophobic surfaces, like PTFE also help reduce friction. However, their lubricity is static rather than activated by water. In turn, while they do help in this area they do not achieve the near-zero friction of hydrophilic coatings.

Advantages of Hydrophobic Coatings:

• Reduced drag compared to uncoated devices
• Durable surface that retains properties over time
• Good for dry environments or where hydration is inconsistent

Last – Uncoated: Highest Friction

In general, uncoated surfaces generate the highest amount of friction when placed against wet tissue surfaces.

Disadvantages:

• More force is required for insertion
• Increased pain and tissue trauma for patient
• Greater risk of device sticking, snagging, or causing micro-tears

Key Takeaway 

In short, Hydrophilic coatings provide the lowest friction and the most reliable navigation. Hydrophobic coatings offer intermediate performance. Uncoated surfaces perform the worst in this area.

2. Ranking Coating Options In Terms of Hemocompatibility & Protein Adsorption^8,9

Hemocompatibility is very important for devices contacting blood. Examples include guidewires, central venous catheters, stents, and introducers. Surface chemistry of the devices affects thrombosis, platelet adhesion, and inflammatory response.

1^st – Hydrophilic Coatings: Excellent Hemocompatibility

Hydrophilic coatings reduce protein adsorption and platelet attachment. This is significantly due to their highly hydrated boundary layer. This prevents the initial events that trigger clot formation.

Advantages of Hydrophilic Coatings: 

• Less platelet adhesion
• Reduced coagulation cascade activation
• Lower thrombogenicity
• Better long-term patency

2^nd – Hydrophobic Coatings: Lower Hemocompatibility

Hydrophobic surfaces tend to absorb proteins more readily. PTFE performs better than many bare plastics, but it still shows:

• More platelet adhesion
• Higher risk of fibrin deposition
• Greater potential for thrombosis

Last – Uncoated: Highest Thrombogenicity

Bare polymers or metals exhibit strong protein adsorption, making them highly thrombogenic.

Key Takeaway 

In short, hydrophilic coated devices are superior for blood-contacting devices, with significantly lower thrombogenic potential. Hydrophobic coatings exhibits more platelet adhesion and greater potential for thrombosis. Uncoated surfaces, such as bare polymers or metals, are highly thrombogenic.

3. Ranking Surface Options In Terms of Tissue Safety & Patient Comfort¹⁰

Navigation through biological pathways must minimize trauma. This is critical in order to reduce complications like bleeding, perforation, or inflammation.

1^st – Hydrophilic Coatings

Hydrophilic coatings are lubricous coatings and reduce friction dramatically. As a result they offer the following advantages:

• Lower insertion force
• Reduce mucosal inflammation
• Prevent “stick-and-slip” injuries
• Improve patient comfort in vascular, urinary, and airway procedures

2^nd – Hydrophobic Coatings

Hydrophobic coatings lower friction relative to uncoated devices. However, they still create higher drag forces than hydrophilic coatings. Tissue irritation risk is lower, but it is still present.

Relative to hydrophilic coatings, the use of uncoated devices results in:

• More drag (friction)
• Greater risk of irritation 

Last – Uncoated Devices

Once again uncoated devices rank at the bottom vs the other two options. can frequently cause:

• Higher tissue resistance
• Pain
• Micro-injuries
• Increased procedural complications

Key Takeaway 

In short, hydrophilic coatings offer the best performance in terms of tissue safety and patient comfort of the three options. Hydrophobic coatings lower friction vs uncoated devices but higher drag forces compared to hydrophilic coatings

4. Ranking Coatings In Terms of Infection Resistance and Biofilm Behavior^11,12

While coatings are not traditional antimicrobials, surface properties influence bacterial adhesion. Hydrophilic coatings can be formulated to serve as antimicrobial coatings as well. 

1^st – Hydrophilic Coatings

Hydrophilic and zwitterionic polymers resist protein and microbial adhesion by creating a hydration barrier. This reduces:

• Biofilm formation
• Bacterial anchoring
• Infection risk in short-term and long-term applications

Tied for Last – Hydrophobic Coatings & Uncoated Surfaces

Hydrophobic surfaces may promote bacterial clustering. This is due to hydrophobic–hydrophobic interactions, especially in the presence of host proteins. 

Even worse in this area are uncoated devices. These show the highest risk for early bacterial colonization and biofilm development.

Key Takeaway 

In short, Hydrophilic coatings provide superior resistance to microbial adhesion when compared to the other two options. The other two options do not do much in terms of the formation of biofilms and bacteria.

5. Ranking Coating Options In Terms of Durability and Mechanical Stability⁴

Durability is essential for devices exposed to repeated bending, twisting, or long-term implantation.

1^st – Hydrophobic Coatings

Hydrophobic coatings, such as PTFE and silicones are highly durable, abrasion-resistant, and chemically inert. They maintain performance over time, making them suitable for:

• Long-term implants
• High-stress mechanical applications

2^nd – Hydrophilic Coatings

Hyrophilic coating offers several advantages, such as: 

• Mechanical durability when properly formulated
• Stable under hydrated conditions

However, they:

• Are susceptible to abrasion when dry or when applied on non-optimized substrates
• Require specific proper formulation and adhesion chemistries to avoid embolism. 

Last – Uncoated Devices

The durability of uncoated devices depends entirely on the substrate material. Without any surface coatings, they suffer from high friction chemical and biological reactivity.

Key Takeaway

In short, hydrophobic coatings provide the best long-term durability. Hydrophilic coatings excel during navigation but require careful formulation.

6. Ranking Coatings In Terms of Regulatory & Clinical Acceptance

Hydrophilic coatings are widely accepted for navigation-focused devices such as:

• Guidewires
• Central venous catheters
• Ureteral catheters
• Neurovascular delivery systems
• Angiographic catheters

Hydrophobic coatings like PTFE are accepted for devices requiring durability and chemical stability:

• Permanent implants
• Sheaths
• Long-term external drainage catheters

Uncoated devices are becoming less common due to their performance drawbacks.

Final Verdict: Which Surface Coating is Better for Medical Device Navigation?

Surface engineering has a significant impact on both the function and safety of devices used in minimally invasive procedures. Hydrophilic coatings consistently outperform other surface modifications with respect to navigation performance. This is because they have the highest level of lubricity, the least amount of tissue damage, the best hemocompatibility, and the least amount of microbial attachment. These factors have made hydrophilic coatings the material of choice for all guidewires, catheters, and any other medical devices requiring precise, low-friction movement through anatomically complex configurations. 

Hydrophobic coatings provide moderate reductions in friction, although not even close to hydrophilic coatings. They do represent a superior class of material when it comes to durability and chemical stability. This makes them useful when developing long-term implants or mechanical applications where durability takes precedence over navigation performance. 

Uncoated devices may provide a cost advantage. However, they pose considerable limitations in terms of friction, reactivity to biological agents, and safety. 

In summary, hydrophilic coatings are the current gold standard for use in navigation-intensive applications. Hydrophobic coatings may serve as viable alternatives for applications where durability is more important than navigation. 

Hydromer®, Inc. is a worldwide leading manufacturer of hydrophilic coatings used by global medical device OEMs. Our coatings have excellent adhesion capabilities to a variety of substrates, including steel and plastic, which are vital in obtaining regulatory permissions for the production of medical products and processes and achieving optimal patient outcomes during surgical procedures. We offer custom coating solutions and flexibility to meet our clients’ specific product requirements. For more information, you can learn more about our products on the Hydromer® Medical Device Coatings page. 

References:

Click here to see the references for this article.

1. Kistler SF, Schweizer PM. Coating Science and Technology: An Overview. In: Kistler SF, Schweizer PM, eds. Liquid Film Coating: Scientific principles and their technological implications. Springer Netherlands; 1997:3-15.

2. Hydromer. Medical Device Coatings. Hydromer. https://hydromer.com/medical-device-coatings/

3. Hydromer. Hydrophilic Coatings: What They Are and Common Uses. https://hydromer.com/hydrophilic-coatings-comprehensive-guide/

4. Ahmad D, van den Boogaert I, Miller J, Presswell R, Jouhara H. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials and their applications. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2018/11/17 2018;40(22):2686-2725. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1511642

5. Kumar R, Kumar Sahani A. Role of superhydrophobic coatings in biomedical applications. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021/01/01/ 2021;45:5655-5659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.457

6. Edwards PA, Price M, Nimchuk N, Mahon J. Novel Water Loving Coatings (WLC) Lubricious and Durable Guidewires. 2017; Accessed 2/1/2025. https://doi.org/10.1115/DMD2017-3434 2017 Design of Medical Devices Conference

7. Niemczyk A, El Fray M, Franklin SE. Friction behaviour of hydrophilic lubricious coatings for medical device applications. Tribology International. 2015/09/01/ 2015;89:54-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.02.003

8. Kuchinka J, Willems C, Telyshev DV, Groth T. Control of Blood Coagulation by Hemocompatible Material Surfaces-A Review. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland). Dec 15 2021;8(12)doi:10.3390/bioengineering8120215

9. Perera SL, Hagemeyer CE, Smith JA, Carberry J, Niego Be. Improvement of Hemocompatibility in Passive Cardiovascular Implant Devices. Advanced Therapeutics. 2025/11/28 2025;n/a(n/a):e00183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.202500183

10. Plata M, Santander J, Zuluaga L, et al. Hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters for clean intermittent catheterization: a meta-analysis to determine their capacity in reducing urinary tract infections. World Journal of Urology. 2023/02/01 2023;41(2):491-499. doi:10.1007/s00345-022-04235-5

11. Ali S, Khan OS, Youssef AM, Saba I, Alfedaih D. Hydrophilic catheters for intermittent catheterization and occurrence of urinary tract infections. A retrospective comparative study in patients with spinal cord Injury. BMC urology. 2024/06/12 2024;24(1):122. doi:10.1186/s12894-024-01510-y

12. Di Domenico EG, Oliva A, Guembe M. The current knowledge on the pathogenesis of tissue and medical device-related biofilm infections. Microorganisms. 2022;10(7):1259.