Digital Twins in Coating: Using AI to Simulate the Coating Process Before It Happens

A coating digital twin is a computer model that simulates how a coating is applied to a device. It combines a virtual version of the device with mathematical equations that describe the coating process.

Innovations in medical devices such as stents and implants have transformed biomedical engineering.^1,2 Their patient-specific geometries improve surgical fit. However, geometric complexity creates manufacturing challenges, even for smart, automated coating equipment. Medical devices, such as implants need functional coatings. Medical device coatings may be hydroxyapatite coatings for osseointegration, drug-eluting and thromboresistant coatings, or antimicrobial silver coatings, etc. The coating of medical devices is also becoming increasingly complex. Manufacturers now use intricate geometries, miniaturized components, and patient-specific devices. Many of them are produced through additive manufacturing.^3,4

Digital twins create virtual copies of coating processes. They let manufacturers simulate and predict thickness problems before production starts. Digital twins use cutting edge technology, such as AI, machine learning, and sensor data to work.⁵ They can predict how a coating will spread. They find areas with too much or too little coating. They optimize process settings and cut down on physical tests. 

This article explores how digital twins work and their role in improving coating precision. If you are a biomedical engineer, manufacturing engineer, or plant manager you will definitely want to read this article to the end.

Key Takeaways

• Digital twins create virtual copies of coating processes.
• They let manufacturers simulate and predict thickness problems before production starts.
• They optimize process settings and cut down on physical tests.
• This approach reduces material waste, speeds up development, and improves manufacturing efficiency.

Why Complex Medical Devices Are Difficult to Coat Uniformly

As device complexity increases the difficulty of coating them also increases. Below are some of the main reasons why this is true. 

1. Complex surfaces are much harder to coat evenly. Sharp transitions, pores, lattice structures, recesses, undercuts, and branching geometries create coating challenges. Variable surface curvature adds difficulty.⁶
2. Three-dimensional printing produces implants and medical components with customized architectures. Conventional machining cannot easily create these designs. Porous structures, trabecular-like surfaces, internal channels, lattice frameworks, and patient-specific geometries improve implant function. However, these same features make coating difficult.⁷
3. During dip coating, spray coating, or automated coating, liquid does not distribute uniformly. Gravity, surface tension, viscosity, withdrawal speed, spray angle, atomization, substrate orientation, and local geometry all affect the final coating. Sharp edges receive more material. Recessed areas receive less. Complex internal structures have limited spray access and inadequate fluid exchange. The result is a coating that looks acceptable but has substantial local thickness variations.⁸
4. For medical devices, this variation matters a lot. Thin coatings may fail to provide lubricity, corrosion protection, biocompatibility, or functional performance. Thick regions may crack, delaminate, alter device dimensions, increase friction, or interfere with mechanical performance.⁹

Digital twins identify these problems computationally before physical manufacturing begins.

What Is a Digital Twin for Coating Simulation?

A coating digital twin is a computer model that simulates how a coating is applied to a device. It combines a virtual version of the device with mathematical equations that describe the coating process. The virtual device can be built from a CAD design or, in 3D printing, from the digital file used to create the part.

The model tracks many factors: the shape and material of the surface, the coating mixture, how thick or thin it is, temperature, and how it’s applied. For spray coating, it also includes nozzle position, spray pattern, pressure, flow rate, distance, and angle. For dip coating, it tracks how fast the part is pulled out, how deep it goes, how long it stays in, and how the liquid drains.

Artificial intelligence (AI) makes the model smarter. Instead of running slow computer simulations, machine-learning models learn patterns between the process settings and the actual coating results. Once trained, they can quickly predict coating thickness across the entire surface of a complex part.^5,10

The digital twin isn’t just a frozen simulation. It improves as real manufacturing data are collected and added to it.

How a Digital Twin For Coating Works

1. Simulating the Coating Process Before Manufacturing

A coating digital twin lets engineers test coating processes virtually before doing them in real life.¹¹ This turns process development from trial-and-error into predictive engineering. The following steps are taken to evaluate hundreds or thousands of combinations and find the best ones for uniform coating:

• Design for coat-ability: Designers can use a digital twin to evaluate lattice geometries prior to implementing their design plans. If any areas are predicted to have issues with coating, alterations can be made to the design in advance that will adjust things such as the size of pores, angles of struts, and shape of lattices.¹²
• Process parameter optimization: Where the implant design does not change, a digital twin can vary spray parameters, such as spray distance, part rotation, number of axes in rotation, and powder delivery rate in order to test a specific coating.¹³
• Fixture and orientation planning: Since coating uniformity depends on how the piece was held and oriented while being coated, a digital twin can run simulations using different fixtures and methods of rotation, allowing it to determine the best orientation for coating.¹³
• Batch-to-batch variation prediction: Coating chambers change over time due to erosion of the sprayers, wear on the nozzle, or depletion of the coating solution. A digital twin equipped with data from real sensors can warn engineers when the spray solution needs to be updated, as well as where problems may arise.¹⁴

2. AI-Based Prediction of Coating Thickness

A digital coating twin generates a 3D model that illustrates the thickness of the coating. Rather than giving a single average value, it estimates the thickness of the coating at every point in the device. This allows us to visualize where the coating is too thick, too thin, or of an acceptable quality. 

Models based on machine learning are able to gain knowledge from the experimental data obtained with such measurement tools as optical profilometry, microscopy, and scanning techniques.

The AI model understands how changes in a technological process influence the spreading of the coating layer on the surface. 

As more information is collected, the prediction of the model becomes more accurate. If the data shows that increased spraying pressure improves coating in one device design but leads to overcoating at sharp corners, the model will record this effect. The same simulation will allow the manufacturer to know if there will be similar issues in other designs. This is beneficial for manufacturers who have several designs rather than a single product.^5,10

3. Digital Twin Optimization of Spray and Dip Coating

Digital twins help improve spray and dip coating processes.^5,15

• Spray Coating: Digital twins create virtual models of spray nozzles. They test different paths and coverage patterns. Robots can use these optimized paths to coat hard-to-reach surfaces from different angles. The system identifies where extra coats are needed and where to skip coating.
• Dip Coating: Digital twins simulate how the coating solution behaves when a part is dipped and pulled out. Withdrawal speed matters most because it controls how much liquid stays on the surface. Viscosity, evaporation, drainage, and part orientation also change the final coating thickness.

What is the benefit of using AI? 

AI combines all these factors with past coating data. It finds the best settings to achieve the desired thickness without extensive trial-and-error testing.

4. From Simulation to Closed-Loop Coating

Digital twins work best when connected to automated coating equipment. In traditional manufacturing, engineers set coating parameters and start production. Sensors monitor some variables, but fixes happen after problems occur. A digital-twin system creates a continuous feedback loop.

1. Design 
2. Simulation 
3. Parameter optimization 
4. Physical coating
5. Sensor monitoring
6. AI analysis 
7. Digital-twin update
8. Process adjustment

Sensors collect data on temperature, pressure, flow rate, spray performance, substrate position, humidity, and curing conditions. 

The digital twin compares what actually happens to what was predicted. If something deviates from the plan, AI analyzes whether it will affect coating thickness or quality. The process adjusts automatically within safe limits. This shifts manufacturing from fixing problems after they happen to preventing them before they occur.¹⁶

What Role Digital Twins Play in the Manufacturing of 3D-Printed Implants, and What Are the Challenges?

The combination of 3D printing and digital coating technology is extremely promising. For instance, the 3D printing process allows implants to take complex shapes that would be ideal for integration with bone tissue or tissue growth. Nevertheless, the presence of those complex shapes presents a challenge in terms of coating them.

Thanks to a digital twin, one can examine the shape of an implant before proceeding with production. The digital twin can be used to identify areas where coating will not be properly applied. Examples of such areas could be narrow passages or steep surfaces.

The technology is capable of suggesting the most suitable coating methods to deal with the specific shape mentioned.

This methodology allows one to create patient-specific implants that will fit specific individual characteristics. When an individual design of an implant is chosen for a different patient, the digital twin is able to recreate the coating method on its own.¹⁷

Below are the main roles of digital twins in this area. 

1. Predicting More Than Coating Thickness

Digital twins for coatings can do more than predict thickness. They can track many quality factors at once. Some examples include: 

• AI models can predict surface coverage, roughness, adhesion risk, curing behavior, friction, defect probability, and coating failure likelihood.
• For medical device coatings that attract water, a digital twin could link formulation, coating thickness, curing conditions, hydration behavior, and friction performance.
• For protective coatings on metal devices, the model could track coating uniformity, substrate characteristics, and environmental exposure.

This approach creates a multidimensional quality model that goes beyond simple thickness simulation.⁵

2. Reducing Coating Waste and Development Time 

Digital twins reduce the need for physical experiments. This saves time and money.

Coating development usually requires many trial runs. This is especially true when testing new materials, formulas, shapes, or coating machines. Each test uses materials and manufacturing time. It may also require a lot of testing and analysis.

Virtual experiments can help before physical production starts. Instead of testing many combinations randomly, engineers can use digital twins to find the best parameter ranges. Then they test only a smaller number physically. This approach reduces material waste, speeds up development, and improves manufacturing efficiency.

The benefits are even greater when expensive medical devices or special coatings are involved.⁵

Challenges to Implementing Coating Digital Twins

As helpful as they are digital twins do have limits. They cannot replace real-world testing. Some of their limitations and considerations include: 

• A digital twin is only as good as its data and math formulas.
• Coating processes are complex. They involve fluid movement, evaporation, surface changes, substrate motion, and curing. These are hard to model accurately.
• AI models need good training data. A model trained on simple shapes may fail on porous or lattice implants. Data from one coating recipe or machine may not work for another.
• Testing is very much necessary. Scientists must compare predictions to real measurements of coating thickness and quality. The model improves as new data arrives, but testing and data collection are necessary.
• Medical device manufacturers must also consider traceability, validation, cybersecurity, data protection, and change control.

Conclusion

Digital twins and AI can transform how medical devices are coated. Instead of using trial-and-error, manufacturers can now use data and predictions. Digital twins let companies simulate coating before it happens physically. This helps them spot thickness problems, adjust spray settings, improve coverage on complex shapes, and skip unnecessary tests.

This technology works especially well for 3D-printed implants. These implants have porous structures, curved surfaces, and patient-specific designs that make coating difficult. When digital twins work with automated equipment, sensors, and machine learning, they can move beyond simple simulations. They can optimize the coating process in real time and make adjustments as they go.

The real goal is not just predicting uniform coating. It is building a manufacturing system that predicts, controls, learns, and continuously improves coating quality before problems reach the final device. As additive manufacturing, AI, robotics, and coating technology advance together, digital twins could become essential for the next generation of smart medical-device manufacturing.

Work With Hydromer’s Coating Team

Hydromer®, Inc. has 40+ years of medical device coating experience alongside a full range of coating equipment and contract coating services. Whether you are building your own line with coating equipment to bring digital twin simulation in-house, or you need a partner to apply hydrophilic, antimicrobial, drug-eluting, or thromboresistant coatings to your device, Hydromer’s coating engineers can help.

Explore Hydromer Coating Equipment →
See Hydromer Medical Device Coatings →

Frequently Asked Questions 

References

View all references & citations (17)

1. Baltatu MS, Vizureanu P, Sandu AV, Florido-Suarez N, Saceleanu MV, Mirza-Rosca JC. New titanium alloys, promising materials for medical devices. Materials. 2021;14(20):5934.

2. Kazmierska KA, Ciach T. Bioactive coatings for minimally invasive medical devices: Surface modification in the service of medicine. Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering (Discontinued). 2009;2(1):1-14.

3. Singh AB, Khandelwal C, Dangayach GS. Revolutionizing healthcare materials: Innovations in processing, advancements, and challenges for enhanced medical device integration and performance. Journal of Micromanufacturing. 2024:25165984241256234.

4. Yang H, Fang H, Wang C, et al. 3D printing of customized functional devices for smart biomedical systems. SmartMat. 2024;5(5):e1244.

5. Rathore MM, Shah SA, Shukla D, Bentafat E, Bakiras S. The role of ai, machine learning, and big data in digital twinning: A systematic literature review, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE access. 2021;9:32030-32052.

6. Tewari K, Thapliyal D, Bhargava CK, et al. Innovative coating methods for the industrial applications. Functional coatings: innovations and challenges. 2024:23-50.

7. Shaikh M, Kahwash F, Lu Z, Alkhreisat M, Mohammad A, Shyha I. Revolutionising orthopaedic implants—a comprehensive review on metal 3D printing with materials, design strategies, manufacturing technologies, and post-process machining advancements. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2024;134(3):1043-1076.

8. Hardide. The coating challenges that come with complex geometries. 2024; https://blog.hardide.com/overcoming-the-challenges-of-coating-complex-geometries.

9. Okokpujie IP, Tartibu LK, Musa-Basheer HO, Adeoye AOM. Effect of coatings on mechanical, corrosion and tribological properties of industrial materials: a comprehensive review. Journal of Bio-and Tribo-Corrosion. 2024;10(1):2.

10. Xu J, Ji Z, Jing X, Zhou H, Ma H, Wang S. Digital twin based intelligent coating film thickness monitoring system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2026;240(5):666-678.

11. Liu X, Xu J, Ji Z. Real-time characterization system for digital twin film thickness based on an optimized agent model. 2025.

12. Manescu V, Nemoianu I-V, Paltanea G, et al. Gemini-Augmented Digital Twin Framework for Biodegradable Mg-Based Implants: A Proof-of-Concept for Multi-Domain Design Integration. AI. 2026;7(6):221.

13. Liu L, Zhang X, Wan X, Zhou S, Gao Z. Digital twin-driven surface roughness prediction and process parameter adaptive optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2022;51:101470.

14. Wärmefjord K, Söderberg R, Schleich B, Wang H. Digital twin for variation management: A general framework and identification of industrial challenges related to the implementation. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(10):3342.

15. Kim MO. AI-driven polymeric coatings: Strategies for material selection and performance evaluation in structural applications. Polymers. 2025;18(1):5.

16. Iliuţă M-E, Moisescu M-A, Pop E, Ionita A-D, Caramihai S-I, Mitulescu T-C. Digital Twin—A Review of the Evolution from Concept to Technology and Its Analytical Perspectives on Applications in Various Fields. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(13):5454.

17. Ahn S, Kim J, Baek S, Kim C, Jang H, Lee S. Toward Digital Twin Development for Implant Placement Planning Using a Parametric Reduced-Order Model. Bioengineering. 2024;11(1):84.